PC P775DM1-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 58% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPC P775DM1-G  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P775DM1-G
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 12:52
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 113
53% 84 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 322
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 23.2
8% 14.9 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 32.3
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 14%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 299 295 295 299 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,505
Write 643
Mixed 605
SusWrite 301
168% 763 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 41.1
141% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 374
272% 361 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 138%
Great: 247%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
42GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 425 280 176 157 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 466
Mixed 363
SusWrite 267
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 45
149% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
100GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,948
Write 1747
Mixed 1,355
374% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 52
169% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 482
356% 469 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Jmicron JMS583 1TB
950GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 571 555 597 603 603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 504
Write 574
Mixed 538
SusWrite 584
124% 550 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 25
81% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 103
77% 102 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 90%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 87.8
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 105
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P775DM1-G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: PC P775DM1-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback