Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 05 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	KAZ-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 94.1 1-Core 129 2-Core 247 89% 157 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 801 78% 639 Pts	64-Core 1,004 62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 179 Parallax 178 133% 173 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 165 Splatting 114 107% 132 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$209 3,350 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0614D SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 270 148 107 58 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 492 Write 415 Mixed 314 SusWrite 158 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 38.5 139% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 199 170% 249 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 111%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 21GB free Firmware: O1225G SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 174 163 172 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 486 Write 196 Mixed 249 SusWrite 174 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 40 144% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 175 148% 216 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 90%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 19GB free Firmware: P1225CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 54 50 50 43 47 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 484 Write 152 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 65.8 40% 187 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 35.7 135% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 148 126% 188 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 90%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 18GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 67 66 70 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 40 Write 68.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 67.2 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 85%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 54GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 82 82 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 77.7 Write 78 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 81.5 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 197GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 47 50 75 85 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 128 Write 48.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 65.5 47% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 159GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 185 185 187 187 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 111 Mixed 29 SusWrite 184 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 2.1 386% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 107 105 105 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 137 Write 152 Mixed 90 SusWrite 106 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.4 309% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 37.8 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 22.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	326x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	143x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $763

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16