| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | PC Amd Am4 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190307 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 09 '19 at 21:58 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
85% 154 Pts
|
87% 730 Pts
|
82% 1,316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
|
78.9%
Very good
|
82% 92.5 fps
|
73% 91.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU800NS38 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 449 449 455 446 452 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
102% 455 MB/s
|
150% 55.7 MB/s
|
183% 251 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 210 214 215 217 217 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 218 220 220 220 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM4X8GF2666Z16K4 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
97% 33.9 GB/s
|
83% 29.1 GB/s
|
51% 78.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Amd Am4 Builds (Compare 103 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PC Amd Am4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 17x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $604 |