Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4790-$320
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.2% Good
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
79% 168 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 590
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 585
39% 585 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$110
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.82
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 69.6
19% 65.1 fps
MRender 57
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 43.6
18% 56.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$60
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 63 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 95.3
Write 106
Mixed 103
SusWrite 68.8
21% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 27
111% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 92.6
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 74%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 438 325 326 327 327 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 641
Write 548
Mixed 383
SusWrite 373
109% 486 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 49
227% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 643
500% 688 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 148%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
107GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 160 159 160 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 109
SusWrite 158
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$70
26GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 132 137 132 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 42.2
Mixed 71
SusWrite 134
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 4,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $786
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback