| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090223 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 14 '19 at 17:23 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
51.3%
Above average
|
45% 69.9 Pts
|
24% 181 Pts
|
11% 181 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.3
|
29%
Poor
|
30% 39.2 fps
|
28% 32.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 56 59 53 40 44 MB/s
|
40%
Below average
|
22% 96.3 MB/s
|
95% 33.7 MB/s
|
25% 40.2 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
123GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 90 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
57% 77.7 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
24.8%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
41% 96.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 79x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 32x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 26x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |