Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 01:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 248
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 697
74% 588 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,484
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 162
Parallax 146
134% 158 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 205
Splatting 119
138% 176 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 129%
Great: 179%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 10
Parallax 7.16
6% 8.09 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 648 643 643 632 613 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 575
Write 1,062
Mixed 525
SusWrite 652
160% 703 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 64
209% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 890
670% 896 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 168%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback