MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170421
Uptime	10.9 Days
Run Date	May 15 '19 at 17:13
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 164 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 247 31% 236 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 31.2 28% 30.1 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 31.6 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 68 3.8 43 4 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 372 Write 296 Mixed 183 SusWrite 61.9 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 16.5 53% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 41.3 40% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 399GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 139 139 141 140 134 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 158 Write 148 Mixed 31 SusWrite 136 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GB 1,863 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 5.3 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	181x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	94x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	96x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	58x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 5,207 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16