HP SG3-120UK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP SG3-120UK  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AAF
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 75.2
42% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 79.1
10% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 43 35 49 50 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 48
Write 56.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 43
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP497157-D01-ELFWG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback