Compaq-presario BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq-presario BK120AA-ABM CQ5309LA  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Narra6
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 18:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 37
2-Core 80.4
40% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 115
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
EVGA(3842 1450) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Lighting 9.27
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.28
8% 9.62 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 34 32 27 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 97
Write 89.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 26.1
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
455GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 73 96 120 111 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 102
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
349GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 17 19 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 18.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 17.7
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback