Asus P5K-E

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	9.71% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K-E (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080908
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 15 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Memory 30.9 1-Core 22.6 2-Core 43 20% 32.2 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 124 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 079F) 1.2GB CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 12.2 11% 15.6 fps	MRender 20.6 Gravity 15.2 Splatting 19.5 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 33 33 34 34 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.71% Terrible	Read 77.5 Write 66.2 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 33.8 14% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 4.2 15% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 434GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 31 33 33 34 34 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.67% Terrible	Read 78 Write 70.1 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 33.7 14% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 3.1 11% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 8.67% Great: 129%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 143GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 25 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 55.8 Write 21.1 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 23.9 23% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 42%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 193GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.18% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 14.3 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 14.1 20% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 18%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.1 8.6 8.9 8.4 8.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 5.4 SusWrite 8.4 11% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 250 16% 250 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	55x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	15x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
256GB SSD 256GB3Bench 62%, 1,638 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	105x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16