Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 17 '19 at 00:37
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 677 65% 536 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 118 Parallax 111 91% 113 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 104 Splatting 101 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 642 644 639 639 642 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,451 Write 2199 Mixed 1,608 SusWrite 688 388% 1,736 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 75.6 248% 84.3 MB/s	DQ Read 909 DQ Write 698 DQ Mixed 850 623% 819 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 111GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 130 130 130 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 482 Write 134 Mixed 126 SusWrite 130 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 20.9 119% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 50.2 82% 164 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 73%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 59GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 474 Write 161 Mixed 219 SusWrite 160 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 21.3 88% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 55.4 DQ Mixed 92.8 88% 143 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 63%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 53GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 77 64 73 86 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 86 Write 46 Mixed 56 SusWrite 76 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 546GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 111 113 113 113 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 171 Write 144 Mixed 84 SusWrite 112 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2866 MHz clocked @ 1433 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	96% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 31.5 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 36.2 SC Mixed 25.4 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)