Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 14:17
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4770-$305
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
66.8% Good
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
76% 161 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 572
61% 473 Pts
64-Core 571
38% 571 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$129
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 110
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 105
28% 94.4 fps
MRender 78.7
Gravity 101
Splatting 76.9
27% 85.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$130
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 149 149 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 364
SusWrite 183
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.2
214% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 347
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Samsung 830 64GB
35GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 486
Write 162
Mixed 215
SusWrite 160
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 22
92% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 91.2
87% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
161GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 91.3
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $412
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback