Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 45.9 1-Core 25.9 2-Core 35.5 25% 35.8 Pts	4-Core 35.6 8-Core 62 6% 48.8 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0263) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 91 96 118 143 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 150 Write 103 Mixed 111 SusWrite 107 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 11.5 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 60.6 DQ Mixed 65.3 56% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 51%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 855GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 27 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 26.1 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 26.3 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.2 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16