Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 571
68% 526 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2014 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 104
Parallax 86.7
80% 96.5 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 108
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 228 202 186 179 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,392
Write 1,124
Mixed 614
SusWrite 242
187% 843 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 58.7
263% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,152
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 660
629% 984 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 200%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
629GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 485 479 465 464 471 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 481
Write 460
Mixed 427
SusWrite 461
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.3
216% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
406GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 509 508 508 509 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
648GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 100 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 85
SusWrite 104
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 101%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
923GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 120 118 120 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 163
Write 116
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 120
155% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.9
243% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
591GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 94 94 98 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 94
Write 99
Mixed 66
SusWrite 96.9
121% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
170% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback