Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 21 '19 at 10:15
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 133 65% 103 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 322 33% 265 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D 684 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 5.47 6% 7.1 fps	MRender 9.14 Gravity 7.47 Splatting 8.22 7% 8.28 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60 4,402 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 57 52 35 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 126 Write 67.2 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 50.2 18% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 17.8 53% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 44.8 DQ Mixed 21.9 20% 29 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 45%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 824GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 42 41 45 45 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 41.7 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 39.4 27% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 76%
JetFlash Transcend 128GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 17GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 31 30 25 30 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 104 Write 15.3 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 28.2 51% 47 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.3% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.2 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58-USB3 Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	44x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	15x

SSD
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	11x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	63x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	32x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $336

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16