Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 04:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 262
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 664
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 38.2
36% 42 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 350 240 301 303 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 370
Mixed 340
SusWrite 297
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 43.9
160% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 198
177% 266 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
243GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 453 475 479 480 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 465
Mixed 407
SusWrite 471
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.9
222% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
52GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 31 34 34 32 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 98.6
Write 38.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 31.6
57% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.8
159% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback