Lenovo 2349SD6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2349SD6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349SD6
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 21 '16 at 18:06
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 57.6
36% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 80.2
11% 80.8 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M
Legend(17AA 21F4) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3302
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.91
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 502
Write 347
Mixed 356
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 22
101% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 59.2
72% 128 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback