PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7641 |
Motherboard | MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130528 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '19 at 01:48 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOAB6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.9 8.5 6.1 5.2 6.9 MB/s
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 58 59 60 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
815GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 58 59 60 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown PSD34G16002 Kingston ACR256X64D3U16C11G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 178x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 72x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 48x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 25x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $186 |