Medion MD34108/C659

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMedion MD34108/C659  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 688
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.3% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 29
21% 31 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 36.4
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 149 61 59 71 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 542
Write 352
Mixed 391
SusWrite 108
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 38.5
137% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 179
159% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 106 117 114 89 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 442
Write 418
Mixed 288
SusWrite 131
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 41.4
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 174
180% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
271GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 132 134 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 135
Write 141
Mixed 27
SusWrite 133
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34108/C659 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

System: Medion MD34108/C659

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback