PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 03 '19 at 09:08 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 860-$339
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
|
2.22%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 201 175 62 63 55 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
875GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 128 138 138 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 18 19 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
509GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 17 18 18 MB/s
|
8.88%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:00 00 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 198x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 159x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 33x |
A400 480GBKingston $37Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $128 |