Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100802
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '19 at 23:06
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 53.4 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 27.7 26% 33.7 Pts	4-Core 29.4 8-Core 28.9 4% 29.1 Pts	64-Core 42.1 3% 42.1 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847E) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.2% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 31.8 22% 27.7 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 28.1 26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB 1,133 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0414B SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 57 59 61 53 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36% Below average	Read 193 Write 186 Mixed 175 SusWrite 57 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 21.8 74% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 34.3 27% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 113%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 10GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 60 60 61 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 51.8 Write 9.5 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 58.1 25% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 41%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 9GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 82 83 86 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 90 Write 60 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 83.8 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 4 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-770TA-UD3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	16x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	14x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	6x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	6x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	4x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	15x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	11x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16