Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181205
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '19 at 17:33
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 237 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 689 69% 561 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04E1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.2 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.1% Average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 55.2 Parallax 59.3 38% 53.7 fps	MRender 55.3 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 65.1 47% 56.6 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 287GB free Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 292 299 282 275 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 311 Write 298 Mixed 282 SusWrite 285 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 40.4 150% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 394 286% 372 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 230%
Gigabyte GP-ASACNE2100TTTDR 1TB 1,426 User benchmarks, average bench 218% 837GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFMH2.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 910 940 924 934 950 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,616 Write 2,068 Mixed 1,460 SusWrite 1,080 351% 1,556 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 52.5 175% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 635 DQ Mixed 667 537% 764 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 280%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 638GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 132 127 134 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 132 Mixed 66 SusWrite 133 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.4 156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 121%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3.5TB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 175 179 176 172 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 162 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 177 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.5 306% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3.5TB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 172 186 182 181 179 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 222 Write 229 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 180 132% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.2 279% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 135%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 111GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 160 162 161 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 105 Write 96.8 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 161 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 91%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 534GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 143 141 140 140 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 133 Write 113 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 140 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK64GX4M4A2400C14 CMK64GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 CMK64GX4M4A2400C14 64GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	97% Outstanding	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 35.1 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	296x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	128x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	180x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	62x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16