PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30F4 |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080623 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 05 '19 at 18:54 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
31.4%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT
HP(103C 30F4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 337.88
|
1.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS543232L9SA00 320GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB4OC43C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 23 16 20 21 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 232x |
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 184x |
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 137x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |