HP ProBook 6460b (A2F99EC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 6460b (A2F99EC)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 03:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 120
56% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 171
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 161C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.35
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 186 137 90 109 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 370
Write 187
Mixed 168
SusWrite 134
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 15.1
81% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 226
179% 248 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback