QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '19 at 13:39
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770 117 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 71 1-Core 96 2-Core 165 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 374 44% 341 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 64.9 Reflection 71.2 Parallax 55.7 53% 63.9 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 75 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 84 98 99 95 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.1% Below average	Read 145 Write 106 Mixed 120 SusWrite 92.3 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 11.2 46% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 108 86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 68%
Red Hat VirtIO 376GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 209GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 64 61 62 65 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.91% Terrible	Read 59.3 Write 62.5 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 62.2 13% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 2% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.5 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16