PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5KPL-AM-CKD-VISUM-SI (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090520 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 08 '19 at 22:57 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.5%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
XFX(1682 243B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 42 44 44 50 51 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
121GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 47 47 52 53 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 6x |
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 5x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $178 |