| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170908 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 10 '19 at 08:13 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | IRN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.9%
Very good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
52% 374 Pts
|
26% 422 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30.8%
Below average
|
31% 33.6 fps
|
30% 36.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 5.9 89 63 30 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
51% 232 MB/s
|
37% 11.1 MB/s
|
11% 29 MB/s
|
|
|
37.8%
Below average
|
39% 52.4 MB/s
|
46% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HX424C15FB/4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.2%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
57% 70.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B250M-A Builds (Compare 4,552 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-A - $74
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,289x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 959x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 710x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 529x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 467x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 461x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $385 |