Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 136
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 350
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 76.6
61% 77 fps
MRender 76
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 63.2
56% 69.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 73 75 76 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 128
Write 111
Mixed 116
SusWrite 75.1
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 24.4
86% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 31.8
31% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 28
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 28.6
20% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 98%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
363GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 69
Write 57.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 64
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 43%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 120 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 113
Write 51.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 121
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
122GB free
Firmware: 8.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 51 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 50.8
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 51.7
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 35 27 24 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 152
Write 55.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 37.2
87% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.7
146% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback