Foxconn P35AP-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Foxconn P35AP-S (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn P35AP-S
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081024
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Memory 31.6 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 55 23% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 92.4 8-Core 78.5 12% 85.4 Pts	64-Core 46.2 3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.6% Average	Lighting 53.2 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 82.3 43% 66.1 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 51.7 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LAM-128M3S 128GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: WAA1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 187 Write 172 Mixed 134 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 20 70% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 30.4 27% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 80%
Samsung HD080HJ 2TB 981GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 146 159 161 172 172 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 157 Write 141 Mixed 62 SusWrite 157 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s

Liteonit LAM-128M3S 2TB 39GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 109 110 111 111 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 95.3 Write 76.2 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 108 61% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.77 MB/s

Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 144 161 161 155 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 96.7 Write 140 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 154 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 2.1 382% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 108%
WD My Book 500GB 3,986 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 234GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 21 Write 17.2 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 16.1 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 246 16% 246 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16