Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 938
85% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,330
82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 97.1
Reflection 108
Parallax 92
79% 99 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 91.8
Splatting 94.1
76% 93.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 51 47 51 52 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 497
Write 430
Mixed 360
SusWrite 71.4
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 28.3
145% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 215
195% 298 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
359GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 370 328 330 330 330 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 490
Mixed 347
SusWrite 362
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 60.3
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 350
269% 365 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
408GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 100
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 32.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback