MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
8 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180423
Uptime20.5 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 01:43
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$248
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
SC Int 112
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 112
92% 115 Pts
QC Int 409
QC Float 441
QC Mixed 416
96% 422 Pts
MC Int 1,057
MC Float 1,123
MC Mixed 1,139
166% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 184
Reflection 162
Parallax 196
58% 180 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 171
Splatting 123
63% 146 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 84%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,926
Write 1,297
Mixed 1,158
323% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 63.3
215% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 937
703% 939 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 325%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$160
65GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 50 52 60 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 111%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$130
19GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 418
Write 404
Mixed 368
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 43.4
147% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 230
212% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$104
13GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 422
Write 401
Mixed 340
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 43.7
149% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 91 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 99.8
Mixed 72
SusWrite 94.9
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung M3 Portable 4TB
59GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 69 69 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 66%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
107GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 58.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 87.8
94% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 30
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 173% - Outstanding Total price: $726
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback