Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '19 at 01:43
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 680 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 150 58% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 563 49% 416 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 83.6 58% 74.1 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 56.9 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$60 1,772 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 703 Write 448 Mixed 382 113% 511 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 35.8 130% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 643 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 264 228% 352 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 213%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 112GB free Firmware: 21.02J21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 56.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 56.6 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 927 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 17.6 Write 17.1 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 17.2 23% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.1 217% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB 7,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	187x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	27x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	14x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 2,352 samples	6x
8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 4x4GBMicronBench 91%, 1,465 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $584

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16