bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 18:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5 650-$215
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
29.8% Poor
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 47.9
19% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 196
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 196
13% 196 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 46.3
12% 42.6 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 42.9
12% 35.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 16%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 255 257 255 259 257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 135%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 44,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback