PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | Default Default string |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181204 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Jun 15 '19 at 13:12 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 346 365 340 358 352 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
42GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 31 34 27 25 29 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TS1GLH72V1H 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,015x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 948x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 897x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 482x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 473x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 454x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |