Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 20:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-9400F-$150
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
84% 178 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 675
74% 571 Pts
64-Core 686
46% 686 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$210
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.2% Good
Lighting 308
Reflection 243
Parallax 240
81% 263 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 245
Splatting 196
65% 193 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$64
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 231 248 222 225 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 789
Write 818
Mixed 778
SusWrite 268
149% 663 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 50.4
184% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 593
476% 668 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 136%
Great: 141%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
139GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 140 138 142 139 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 193 195 163 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 193
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 188
108% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$90
264GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 116 96 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 161
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 111
80% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 99P5723-005.A00G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $835
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback