Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 20:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600K-$251
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.6% Good
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 351
48% 349 Pts
64-Core 362
24% 362 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$280
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51% Above average
Lighting 203
Reflection 180
Parallax 185
53% 189 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 186
Splatting 145
51% 155 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$69
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 61 57 56 61 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 418
Write 405
Mixed 287
SusWrite 92.2
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 40.3
138% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 310
239% 324 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
266GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 141 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 143
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
194GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 74 76 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 64
Write 53
Mixed 28
SusWrite 75.2
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,412
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback