| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A320MH (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 15 '19 at 21:51 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57%
Above average
|
60% 100 Pts
|
32% 246 Pts
|
18% 295 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.2%
Average
|
45% 58.6 fps
|
43% 52.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Biostar S100E-120GB 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1209A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 351 372 382 383 374 MB/s
|
67.6%
Good
|
80% 355 MB/s
|
77% 30.4 MB/s
|
47% 99.7 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38
734GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 128 126 126 128 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
161% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
77.8%
Very good
|
80% 28.1 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
42% 95.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,804 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A320MH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 266x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 196x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 123x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 126x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 111x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $338 |