MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$340
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
1-Core 139
2-Core 266
96% 203 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 663
70% 547 Pts
64-Core 706
47% 706 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$480
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Lighting 294
Reflection 281
Parallax 310
77% 295 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 281
Splatting 194
72% 221 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$70
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 191 159 142 154 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 437
Write 175
Mixed 290
SusWrite 168
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 39.2
152% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 176
162% 251 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$120
139GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 416 327 149 155 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 466
Mixed 396
SusWrite 252
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.5
159% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 305
224% 289 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
119GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 185 195 184 199 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 482
Write 192
Mixed 231
SusWrite 184
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 19.4
129% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 57.7
62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$50
309GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 60.9
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
181GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 104 99 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 78
Write 78.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 102
107% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 45%
Patriot Memory 64GB
59GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 90 91 89 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 159
Write 87
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 83.4
113% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
83% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$76
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 26.8
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 29
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 6,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) - $136

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $320Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback