Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 09:01
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 872
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.91
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 4%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 8.59
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 7.63
Splatting 17
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 233
Parallax 255
188% 239 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 224
Splatting 153
169% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 165%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 327 327 321 304 293 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 1,448
Mixed 534
SusWrite 368
235% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 60.1
222% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 299
352% 593 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 200%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
199GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 483 381 322 323 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 484
Mixed 457
SusWrite 385
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 59.4
199% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 247
200% 278 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
710GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1274 1314 1315 1227 1164 1174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,208
Write 1,060
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 1,245
256% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 86.2
287% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 860
646% 859 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 252%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
55GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 486 485 486 485 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 475
Mixed 379
SusWrite 483
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.7
200% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 166
177% 294 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 144 141 144 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 143
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
710GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 73.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 93.4
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 100 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 93.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 102
60% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 28.2
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $827
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback