Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5200-$50 13,848 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 30.6 2-Core 60.9 32% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 42.8 5% 40.7 Pts	64-Core 31.8 2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 4.12 3% 4.18 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 54 54 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 93.5 Write 56.2 Mixed 66 SusWrite 55 15% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 19.6 57% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 30 27% 39 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 51%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 438GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 111 109 108 107 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 109 Write 111 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 106 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16