Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130504
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 19:43
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467 11,295 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 124 61% 96 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 233 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D 5,822 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 7.66 6% 8.19 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 6.73 Splatting 8.91 6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 136GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 105 78 118 168 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.5% Above average	Read 303 Write 284 Mixed 222 SusWrite 123 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 30.1 104% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 87.1 DQ Mixed 38.1 35% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 55%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 11GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 320 Write 294 Mixed 231 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 30.8 112% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 37.8 35% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 93%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 99 101 101 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 98.6 Write 97.3 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 96.5 110% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 933, 933, 933, 933 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.6% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GBOCZ $106Bench 73%, 3,124 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	1x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBKingstonBench 45%, 349 samples	1x
Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C7 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 472 samples	1x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $488

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16