Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 41.5 1-Core 48.3 2-Core 95.4 36% 61.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 188 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6890 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 3.31 2% 3.09 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB 7,130 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 68 70 68 70 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 352 Write 273 Mixed 271 SusWrite 90.7 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 15 64% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 179 145% 206 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 87%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.5 3 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 7.9 Mixed 9 SusWrite 3.4 11% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 3 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16