Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 35.2 1-Core 39.2 2-Core 73.9 29% 49.4 Pts	4-Core 81 8-Core 82.1 11% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 78.9 5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1980) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4727 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.06 2% 1.52 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.35 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 17GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 40 16 14 13 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 121 Write 56.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 28.3 73% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.4 64% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 39%
SDXC Card 64GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 5GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 32 31 28 28 32 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 21.7 Mixed 23 SusWrite 28.9 36% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 3 138% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16