PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A94 |
Motherboard | MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181205 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 19 '19 at 23:01 |
Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 8698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 150 180 199 187 197 MB/s
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
99GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 183 204 266 366 425 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 293x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 185x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 113x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 140x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 81x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 56x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $791 |