Pcware FLAME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPcware FLAME  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE FLAME
Memory9.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 01:26
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 158
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 412
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3655) 1GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 27.3
17% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 22.6
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 52 17 53 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 196
Write 95
Mixed 115
SusWrite 51.5
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 19.2
69% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 24
23% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
21GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 52 18 54 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 91.3
Write 53.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 53.2
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
47GB free
Firmware: D003DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 18 22 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 58
Write 53.2
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 28.8
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25%
Great: 39%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
7GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 61 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 63.7
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
20GB free
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 82
Write 79.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 63.7
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
ST500LM0 30-2E717D 500GB
14GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 96 97 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 101
Mixed 43
SusWrite 92.7
109% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FLAME Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware FLAME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback