Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 130 55% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 398 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6796) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 95.4 Reflection 143 Parallax 184 78% 141 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 163 Splatting 127 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 240 240 237 240 239 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64% Good	Read 248 Write 237 Mixed 237 SusWrite 239 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 30.4 98% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 133%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 956GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 99 102 103 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 81 Write 60.7 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 102 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 101%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 1.5TB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 164 166 160 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 133 Write 132 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 163 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.7 179% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 112GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.4% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16