Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 00:12
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$175 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 120 58% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 343 35% 283 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 78.3 Reflection 81.8 Parallax 77.7 64% 79.2 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 72.9 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 278 271 272 266 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 415 Write 374 Mixed 289 SusWrite 269 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 26.1 88% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 221 176% 246 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 111GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 67 57 56 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 112 Write 329 Mixed 294 SusWrite 85.4 47% 205 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 26.9 92% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 97.3 112% 193 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 75 75 69 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 166 Write 170 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 71.9 77% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 82GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 74 75 69 75 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 99.3 Write 98.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 71.8 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 211GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.43% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 26.2 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 15 27% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 149GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 25.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 15.1 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A 99U5584-005.A KHX1600C10D3/ 16GB 667, 800, 667, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	224x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $645

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16