HP p6657ch

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6657ch (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AA9
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 19:04
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 41 2-Core 81.4 45% 67.5 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 246 26% 205 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 71.1 Reflection 78.5 Parallax 67.7 58% 72.5 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 71.8 48% 56.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2. SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 80 85 81 82 78 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 156 Write 96.5 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 83.6 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 22.6 71% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 91.9 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 41.1 48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 80%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 359 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 658GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 80 87 84 84 79 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.7% Poor	Read 220 Write 99.3 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 85.4 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 12.1 49% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 19.6 DQ Mixed 17.1 13% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 298GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 80 87 84 84 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 79.5 Write 116 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 85.4 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 75%
WD 10EARS External 1TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 909GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 25.8 Mixed 22 SusWrite 26.3 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 1,560 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.3 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.2 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6657ch

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)