Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 117
58% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 355
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 88.9
53% 74.1 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 57
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 123 114 123 113 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 485
Write 454
Mixed 311
SusWrite 144
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 44
150% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 146
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
213GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 46.9
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 35
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 35%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 750GB
186GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 79.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 79.2
89% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback