Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 714
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 113
Parallax 88.7
85% 102 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 119
Splatting 99.9
85% 104 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 247 250 251 257 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 449
Write 307
Mixed 253
SusWrite 258
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 27.2
135% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 163
127% 176 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 129%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
78GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 85 83 97 111 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 324
Write 118
Mixed 143
SusWrite 94.1
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 35.1
132% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 70.5
57% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 75%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
272GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 22
SusWrite 65.5
55% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
22GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 88 84 86 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46% Average
Read 75.7
Write 67.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 85.1
44% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback